Received: from relay1.UU.NET (relay1.UU.NET [192.48.96.5]) by keeper.albany.net (8.7.1/8.7.1) with ESMTP id MAA10668 for <dwarner@albany.net>; Fri, 5 Jan 1996 12:55:34 -0500 (EST)
Received: from garcia.com by relay1.UU.NET with SMTP
id QQzxfq11335; Fri, 5 Jan 1996 12:40:06 -0500 (EST)
Received: from (localhost) by garcia.com (5.x/SMI-SVR4)
id AA01478; Fri, 5 Jan 1996 12:39:58 -0500
Date: Fri, 5 Jan 1996 12:39:58 -0500
Errors-To: dwarner@albany.net
Message-Id: <9601050704.AA00e2d@meta.burner.com>
Errors-To: dwarner@albany.net
Reply-To: lightwave@garcia.com
Originator: lightwave@garcia.com
Sender: lightwave@garcia.com
Precedence: bulk
From: jkrutz@meta.burner.com (Jamie Krutz) ()
To: Multiple recipients of list <lightwave@garcia.com>
Subject: World Construction Set (was re: World Builder)
X-Listprocessor-Version: 6.0c -- ListProcessor by Anastasios Kotsikonas
Status: RO
X-Status:
> On Thu, 4 Jan 1996 Jason Hough <jhough@qualcomm.com> wrote:
> > On Wed, 3 Jan 1996 KasunicJ@aol.com wrote:
> > > Has anyone heard of the progroam World Builder? I saw it's add in 3D Design
> > > magazine and it looks great. It costs about $1000 though. Anyway, how does
> > > it compare to World Construction Set?
I haven't played with WBuilder, but from what I've read WB runs on MSDOS.
World Construction Set runs under AmigaOS (V1 and V2-prerelease shipping
now) and NT (render engine very close to shipping, full program coming later).
WCS NT support includes Intel-based and DEC Alpha computers. WBuilder
might be coming to NT but I'm not sure.
World Construction Set has several features that directly support integration with
Lightwave, while AFAIK WB does not offer such features.
World Construction Set has extensive animation support of motion, ecosystem
and color parameters, including graphically editable spline-based key frame
animation with tension, continuity and bias control (much like Lightwave); I don't
know what kind of animation features are in WBuilder.
I've seen excellent images from both programs. World Construction Set is a
comprehensive graphic information system (GIS) based program, while WB
seems to be focused on a certain subset of landscape creation.
> > Having not used either of them, I'm no expert, but from what I understand
> > WCS is better for "far away" landscape views, and for direct LW exports,
> > etc. WB is better for "close-up" stuff like trees and blades of grass,
> > but way to heavy on the polygon count for far-away type backgrounds.
While that was the case for World Construction Set V1, WCS V2 has a new
class of 3D-shaded trees (user customizable) that looks great both in close-up
shots and panoramic views. WB apparently has particle grass that can move in
the "wind," although the trees don't move. (for WCS you can do foreground
waving particle grass in Lightwave if you like). Aside from that, both can do
great closeups, and the distant mountains will look better in WCS. I don't believe
WBuilder can render the whole planet, or even knows the earth is a sphere,
however World Construction Set does everything based on an accurate
spherical planet and can render the entire earth.
World Construction Set V2 also adds new features like 3D evolving clouds; a
new form of fractal rendering for better detail with faster rendering times;
realistic stratification in rock formations; the sun and moon in the sky; and
waves, breakers, and accurate reflections on the water with automatic
beaches and even support for tides.
> > I still use KPT Bryce on the Mac for backgrounds when I just need a still
